Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

Comments: 8 +-   Blizzard Previews Revamped Battle.net on Wednesday February 10, @04:40AM

Posted by Soulskill on Wednesday February 10, @04:40AM
from the find-out-precisely-how-bad-you-are dept.
internet
Blizzard updated the official StarCraft II site today with a preview of how the revamped Battle.net will function. They emphasize the social features, competitive matchmaking system, and the ease of sharing mods and maps. Quoting: "When the legacy Battle.net service introduced support for user-created mods such as DotA, Tower Defense, and many others, these user-created game types became immensely popular. But while Battle.net supported mods at a basic level, integration with tools and the mod community wasn't where it needed to be for a game releasing in 2010. The new Battle.net service will see some major improvements in this area. StarCraft II will include a full-featured content-creation toolkit — the same tools used by the StarCraft II design team to create the single-player campaign. To fully harness the community's mapmaking prowess, Battle.net will introduce a feature called Map Publishing. Map Publishing will let users upload their maps to the service and share them with the rest of the community immediately on the service. This also ties in with the goal of making Battle.net an always-connected experience — you can publish, browse, and download maps directly via the Battle.net client. Finding games based on specific mods will also be much easier with our all-new custom game system, placing the full breadth of the modding community's efforts at your fingertips."
Read More... 8 comments story

Comments: 137 +-   Is Internet Explorer 6/7 Support Required Now? on Wednesday February 10, @02:22AM

Posted by kdawson on Wednesday February 10, @02:22AM
from the slaying-dinosaurs dept.
msie
k33l0r writes "Following Google's announcement ending support for Internet Explorer 6, I find myself wondering whether we (Web developers) really need to continue providing support for IE6 and IE7. Especially when creating Web sites intended for technical audiences, wouldn't it be best to end support for obsoleted browsers? Would this not provide additional incentives to upgrade? Recently I and my colleagues had to decide whether it was worth our time to try to support anything before IE8, and in the end we decided to redirect any IE6/7 user-agent to a separate page explaining that the site is not accessible with IE 6 or 7. This was easy once we saw from our analytics that fewer than 5% of visitors to the site were using IE at all. Have you had to make a choice like this? If so, what was your decision and what was the reasoning behind it?"
Read More... 137 comments story

Comments: 110 +-   India Suspended From PayPal For "At Least a Few Months" on Tuesday February 09, @11:24PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @11:24PM
from the keeping-the-money-out dept.
government
More details have come about about what was behind PayPal's decision to suspend personal payments to any user in India, as we discussed on Sunday. In a blog post today, PayPal revealed that payments to India will remain in suspension for at least a few months. Customers in India will be able to pull rupees out of the service into their bank accounts within a few days. The suspension came about when Indian government regulators raised questions about whether PayPal's service was enabling remittences (transfers of money by foreign workers) to Indian citizens. "The problems may have been triggered by a marketing push that promotes PayPal as a way to send money abroad, a source familiar with the matter said. The campaign — which reads 'As low as $1.50 to send $300 to countries like India' — may have caught the attention of Indian regulators, the source said."
Read More... 110 comments story

Comments: 155 +-   Google Buzz — First Reactions on Tuesday February 09, @09:20PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @09:20PM
from the what-it-is dept.
google
Google announced Buzz today, as we anticipated this morning. CNET has a workmanlike description of the social-networking service, which is integrated into gmail. CNET identifies a central obstacle Buzz will have to overcome to gain traction: "The problem, however, will be the increasing backlash Google is seeing from the general public over how much data the company already controls on their online habits." Buzz is being rolled out over the next few days so some people will see a Buzz folder in their gmail, but most won't yet (this Twitter post explains how Safari users can get an early glimpse). A blog posting up at O'Reilly Answers points out some of the distinguishing characteristics of Google Buzz — one interesting one being its ability to post an update either pubilcly or privately, at the user's option. This design choice places it between the public-by-default Twitter and the private-by-default Facebook. Lauren Weinstein sounds a note of caution about the inherent privacy risks of Google's method of filling out initial friend profiles by automatic friending.
Read More... 155 comments story

Comments: 234 +-   A "Never Reboot" Service For Linux on Tuesday February 09, @07:21PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @07:21PM
from the bits-don't-rot dept.
security
An anonymous reader writes "Ksplice, the company based on the MIT Ksplice project, is now offering its 'never reboot' service for Red Hat, Debian, and other Linux distros. You subscribe and get real-time kernel security updates that apply in-memory instead of rebooting. Last summer we discussed the free service for Ubuntu. Cool tech, but will people really pay $4 a month for this?"
Read More... 234 comments story

Comments: 98 +-   Submit Your Comments About ACTA on Tuesday February 09, @06:40PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @06:40PM
from the piece-of-your-mind dept.
government
alex_guy_CA Notes that the US Trade Representative — who has been negotiating the secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement without input from the American people or Congress — is seeking public submissions on how to conduct US foreign copyright policy. This means that Americans can file comments with the USTR asking for ACTA to be made public. Public Knowledge explains the process: "Under the Special 301 process the USTR seeks input from US copyright, trademark, and patent owners about whether policies and practices in foreign countries deny them adequate IP protection. The process has generally been used by IP holders to complain not only about lax enforcement in other countries, but also about limitations and exceptions in their laws that are beneficial to libraries, to education, to innovation, and to the public interest generally. The ability to comment in the Special 301 process is not limited to IP owners only. Any member of the public is free to file comments. If you believe in the importance of balanced copyright policies, file comments with the USTR and make your voice heard. Comments can be filed electronically via http://www.regulations.gov/ docket number USTR-2010-0003. You have to include the term '2010 Special 301 Review' in the 'Type Comment and Upload File' field. ... Deadline for filing is February 16 by 5 pm"
Read More... 98 comments story

Comments: 99 +-   Swiss Firm Claims Boost In Android App Performance on Tuesday February 09, @05:53PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @05:53PM
from the sixty-fps-here-we-come dept.
cellphones
Precision writes to inform us about the Swiss firm Myriad, which claims a 3x boost in Android app performance and longer battery life with a new virtual machine. Myriad says that its technology is 100% compatible with existing Android apps. "The tool is a replacement for the Dalvik virtual machine, which ships as part of the Android platform, and retains full compatibility with existing software. Dalvik Turbo also supports a range of processors including those based on ARM, Intel Atom, and MIPS Architectures."
Read More... 99 comments story

Comments: 175 +-   XCore's EduBook, a Netbook That Runs on AA Batteries on Tuesday February 09, @05:06PM

Posted by timothy on Tuesday February 09, @05:06PM
from the when-simplicity-is-key dept.
portables
I'm typing this on a netbook with no hard drive, not using a chip from Intel or AMD, and powered by AA batteries. Eight rechargeable AAs, to be precise, in a bank of cells right where a Li-Ion battery would sit in a conventional laptop. The batteries charge in place, too (regulation prevents overcharging) meaning that the power cord is a simple three-prong-to-cloverleaf cord, no wall-wart required. It's the EduBook from Xcore (see that page for some photos of the internals, too), and it's a cool concept. Despite some warts, it's one of the most interesting things I ran into on the CES show floor last month (Xcore's Michael Barnes kindly supplied the laptop, straight from the display case). Read on for my review.
Read 11433 More Bytes... 175 comments story

Comments: 233 +-   Microsoft Says Windows 7 Not Killing Batteries on Tuesday February 09, @04:20PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @04:20PM
from the epidemic-of-noticing dept.
bug
VindictivePantz sends word that the Windows 7 team has posted a new blog entry discussing their conclusions about the reported Windows 7 battery failures. "To the very best of the collective ecosystem knowledge, Windows 7 is correctly warning batteries that are in fact failing and Windows 7 is neither incorrectly reporting on battery status nor in any way whatsoever causing batteries to reach this state. In every case we have been able to identify the battery being reported on was in fact in need of recommended replacement. ...every single indication we have regarding the reports we've seen are simply Windows 7 reporting the state of the battery using this new feature and we're simply seeing batteries that are not performing above the designated threshold. ... We are as certain as we can be that we have addressed the root cause and concerns of this report, but we will continue to monitor the situation."
Read More... 233 comments story

Comments: 157 +-   Re-Engineering the Immune System on Tuesday February 09, @03:34PM

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday February 09, @03:34PM
from the immunity-two-point-oh dept.
biotech
destinyland notes a microbiology professor describing "Immunity on Demand" (or "Immunity 2.0") and wonders whether we could genetically engineer all the antibodies we need. "...there's a good chance this system, or something like it, will actually be in place within decades. Caltech scientists have already engineered stem cells into B cells that produce HIV-fighting antibodies — and an NIH researcher engineered T cells that recognize tumors which has already had promising clinical trials again skin cancer. Our best hope may be to cut out the middleman. Rather than merely hoping that the vaccine will indirectly lead to the antibody an individual needs, imagine if we could genetically engineer these antibodies and make them available as needed?"
Read More... 157 comments story

 
Poll If Everyone Had To Pass A Particular 101 Course, It Should Be About...
Basic Math & Science
Skepticism
Logic
Computers
Manners
Grammar/Communication
Shurikens
Other, Listed Below
[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:993 | Votes:32418

Slashdot Login

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Recent reviews from Slashdot readers:

Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus

No man in the world has more courage than the man who can stop after eating one peanut. -- Channing Pollock